Over at RealClearPolitics.com, Jeremy interviews Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn. The interview was posted Saturday, just as the House was heading towards the final stretch on health care reform bill vote. Things got a little fiesty between him and McCollum, a liberal and feminist, but that made for some interesting exchanges:
RCP: The first House bill included a “public option” – that is, a government run and subsidized insurance plan that would compete with private companies. That’s gone now and a lot of progressives are upset about that. What’s the logic behind the House now backing a different bill that arguably gives a huge handout to the insurance companies by forcing all Americans to purchase insurance?
McCollum: I wouldn’t call it a huge handout to insurance companies. We’re telling insurance companies that if we are going to make sure that everyone has insurance coverage, we want to make sure that everyone has insurance coverage that’s usable. So there is a quid pro quo in that.
I don’t use the term government run. The government’s going to set up the rules and the rules are going to be that consumers are going to have access to care when they need it when they purchase policies. The public option was going to be a way in which we had a standard benefit set very similar to to Minnesota Care. The state of Minnesota doesn’t run Minnesota Care. It administers it and it makes sure that there’s a basic quality level healthcare that Minnesota citizens will receive if they are using that policy.
And then there was this:
RCP: Madame Speaker called a meeting of the female Democratic lawmakers Wednesday…
McCollum: Women. We call ourselves women. (Laughs.)
RCP: OK, what was that about?